A replication is tried and the principle is tested of the so-called GMD, the gravito-magnetic device or free energy generator. Hamel said he was inspired by aliens, he even tried to build a flying saucer with it. It was refuted as being a viable option by the Myth busters team. But since no material of that effort could be found on the net, we tried our own replication…. The design is described in an artice of mr. Pierre Sinclair, an associate of Hamel. Article: www.padrak.com Site dedicated to the work of Hamel: www.world- Computermodel of naudin Free energy research pages Anand Aadhar: theorderoftime.com The design is described in an artice of mr. Pierre Sinclair, a former associate of Hamel. Article: www.padrak.com Site dedicated to the work of Hamel: www.world-famous.com Computer model of Naudin: www.linux-host.org Free energy research pages Anand Aadhar: theorderoftime.com
28. November 2009 at 10:54 am
You could say the path of least resistance is conserved by magnetism flowing through the iron instead of along the surface if particles that make up the aligned iron atoms are really space traveling in a wave. if so then space obeys hydrodynamic laws of force and motion. They say space does not interact with light and matter but if light traveled at infinity and was slowed by space then a ray of light would be bent by a gravitational or magnetic field or by a prism. E=MC^2… Water-stone-water
12. December 2009 at 1:53 am
the spin comes from the a and b wanting to be alined
the botton b is grounded and picks a side to lean on which now like a weel spins faster when you move the top.
13. December 2009 at 5:51 am
I think that this is a great concept but all you alien people have kind of the underhand. Their are many flaws in the construction
First: Your top magnet is off center
Second: The central magnets aren’t in the center of their respective ring magnets
Third: The ring magnets should be facing the same way, for they are pinching each others fields
Fourth: its supposed to be 1:2:4
Fifth: This looks like it would need incredibly accurate and extensive measurements which you probably don’t have
13. December 2009 at 5:58 am
Second (again): And what i mean by center is that they are pushing down on the lower magnets. they shouldn’t even touch, just close enough to make the higher ups energy go round.
Sixth: You have to apply a starting external force to create near centripital momentum, that is, if you built it right
Seventh: This invention would be great and probably would have been figured out long ago. But all you crazy people had to think it was aliens but instead it was made by some genius living in the…
13. December 2009 at 6:01 am
Middle of nowhere and was probably crazy and said some stuff that he didn’t mean and now it will probably never work because of fools like yourselves who believe in alien contacts and bigfoot and frikin’ ghosts and who take things way out of hand.
13. December 2009 at 6:26 am
Eighth: Your top magnet of the spire is way too small in proportion to the topmost magnet and with your smaller scale, your put the topmost magnet as negative to the topspire magnet.
Ninth: Why is it that you have no research in physics yet you percieve you can constuct one of the most complicated to understand features of the universe.
13. December 2009 at 6:31 am
Tenth: In fixing your upper top of your large scale, you had it working for a split second and apparently didn’t see it.
29. December 2009 at 7:26 am
one word SEG look it up in my channel Prof.John Searl ufo built and flown power that could save the world
29. December 2009 at 7:43 am
In fact I have this video at home. I found it rather disappointing to hear that his closest collaborators never saw anything work of his claims. No IGV nor any SEG apart from the mock-up which is nothing but an electromotor. The thing never achieved the self-running status with witnesses. How Rochin and Godin could replicate the SEG is a mystery to me. We never heard anything ever since about it.. Thus I consider Searl the greatest meke-belief artist around. And he misses his wife now. A pity.
29. December 2009 at 7:50 am
Point eleven: many many have tried replications accounting for all these points, but nobody ever saw it work. It is a make-belief thing apparently.
Point twelve. Artist Reidar Finsrud managed this universal complication perfectly without any theory or physics training. See my other vid watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q on this.
29. December 2009 at 8:07 am
no scientist saw it work NO because all along they were saying it wont work by near complition there was no scientist around because they knew they were wrong and they were back at there lab making there own knowing they were wrong AND INFACT the BBC filmed it working and the british electric company and a judge saw it powering his house. never been spoke of again because the goverment love making money from oil plus this would put millions of people out of jobs
29. December 2009 at 8:20 am
Sometimes one wishes all these bad things were true.
3. January 2010 at 12:38 am
I think the dimensions are wrong. You need more distance between the inner magnets and the outer magnets otherwise the cones cannot develop a proper isotope line. You also need the magnetic ring to float on eachother with repulsive magnets. If you build a static tower it will not work.
11. January 2010 at 5:34 am
This is not a principle. The spin of the first device is generated by the angular rotation of the cone as its held upright. Its just like rolling a tire over the ground, he’s rolling the tip on its curvature. . Darn those laws of physics…. they are proven time and time again
12. January 2010 at 12:56 pm
exactly from space , thats why people who look at this for the first time, they see that this device breaks the law of conservation of energy but when u see thw whole picture it sure doesn’t destroy it.
but please why did u post this video , for your own safety try to delete it…not all people are worthy to know the truth , only who deserves it
13. January 2010 at 7:11 pm
Its neat the way the rotor is held in place by various magnets but there’s no reason for it produce free energy or perpetual motion. At this scale, magnetism is fairly well understood and despite supplying you with a Force for as long as you like, you have to bring your own Energy with you if you want to get work out of magnets.
21. January 2010 at 1:32 pm
your technique here is the failure not the tech I’ve seen this work
22. January 2010 at 8:43 am
I wish I were as sure as you are….but alas I am a (clumsy) scientist.
22. January 2010 at 8:45 am
Confirm the seeker, thus we may find. Those who do not deserve may turn away.
22. January 2010 at 8:46 am
Yeah, a hard boiled thing those laws. It’s very difficult to find an exception.
22. January 2010 at 1:23 pm
no your not clumsy, this is a good build from interpretation of someone elses base idea, just not identical to what he was proposing
22. January 2010 at 2:07 pm
As long as it doesn’t work we are a bunch of clumsy nerds to my opinion. Best is to keep an open mind and not be judgemental.
27. January 2010 at 11:38 pm
I can explane the spin your getting.
The action of dragging the lower magnet across the table with the top is transferring traction onto the ball on the bottom and that is where the spin comes from.
Nice try but it don’t work
18. February 2010 at 11:42 pm
freemicrosoftpoint[DOT]com for a working one…
30. March 2010 at 12:57 am
whenever you hold the top magnet still.. the bottom one stops spinning