MORE ENERGY OUT THEN IN I SHALL SAY NO MORE I DONT CARE WHAT PEOPLE SAY OVERUNITY IS REAL THERE IS A COVERUP ON THIS SCIENCE BELIEVE. BELIEVE OR DONT BELIEVE system description from the inventor The circuit you see in video should be this: run motor on 24V charge 12V batteries AC legs of FWBR overmotor cver motor coil switch DC of FWBR direct into 2nd battery stack of 12V batteries 2nd switch on AC leg of FWBR turns on-off in echo-pulse to motor coil pulse. This makes the motor go down in draw while charging, and up in power dramatically too (rpms and power in shaft) the batteris charge great. this is the best backemf/recoil recovery circuit you can do. generators on shaft pulse out at sinewave peaks and fill caps – caps to load – no lug this way all this is true and you just have to do experiments to see for yourself sinewave peak output from gen is not mentioned on video, neither is AC leg 2nd switch – with these two things in system it is overunity.
11. May 2009 at 7:34 pm
good, we find one key point to agree on. that any supposed “free energy” device will simply be using some unknown or undocumented input. and those inputs count all the energy needed to make the device as well (to create/magnitize the magnets, in the magnet factory, etc.)
11. May 2009 at 7:39 pm
now your mixing metaphysics with science, which does not mix. those sources cannot be acknowledged because the only evidence for their existence is in the head of the believers.
remember, science can only legitimately recognize results that can be observed. that is why we have “laws” of physics. because men have seen them in action for thousands of years, described them mathematically, and found those descriptions to be so consistent as to name them laws (as opposed to Theories/hypothesizes.)
12. May 2009 at 10:34 am
this is what i see
battery @12v dc——–motor/generator @?v ac—–bridge rectifier @ higher v dc—-discharged battery
12. May 2009 at 3:24 pm
” I DONT CARE WHAT PEOPLE SAY ” – means: This is bogus – i ‘believe’ in it – but it has nothing to do with science !
Science is meant to be debated.
BTW: Why is “everyone” so excited about “volts” – that is not the whole truth ! The truth Seems (wihtout digging too much in it) that the real invention here is to have a very efficient system.
If a you could indeed get more enery from this than you put in – why isnt everyone having cars etc with it ? Why havent the inventor such a vehicle ?
/K
13. May 2009 at 4:32 pm
but this means that in some cases, not all input is understood by conventional science yet.
13. May 2009 at 4:40 pm
metaphysics and science doenst mix because it isnt allowed. EVERYTHING in this universe is relative, not just our measured and observable phenomina.
there are more layers to this universe than just the physical. quantum scince is just starting to scratch that surface now…
“…in the head of the believers” look around!! we exist! life exists! atoms exist! it is not some chaotic chance.
life breeds life
not life breeds nothing
life is not in the physical
not life is in the physical
15. May 2009 at 1:30 am
Electric cars use the same concept, you don’t won energy on your system, you loose in heat and friction, electric cars recharge batteries when slowing down, but they run out of energy. Voltage doesn’t indicate energy, that’s the reason why my laptop with a 6600mAh 11,5V batt runs for 6h, and with a 2200mAh 11,5V batt runs for 2h…it simply sustains a higher voltage for longer time, Wattage is another matter, measure W/h running from source battery and W/h arriving to the other battery…
16. May 2009 at 8:18 pm
hmm – ok sure…
They would just sit on it – and almost no one would know about it ?
And the few aamteures experimenting would not be able to explain their results scientificaly – ok.
/K
17. May 2009 at 12:45 am
Over-unity proponents are worse than Keynesians
17. May 2009 at 12:35 pm
Conspiracy theories in general i think is BS ! Two people can hardly keep a secret – so that 100s of highly competitive, power hungry people would do it -not a chance !
We still have som early EV’s here in sweden rolling around, such as REanult 5′s with batteries – goin up to 100 kph, or they mybe used to, range about 50 kms- pretty scarppy by now !
That non-profitable, poor elecrit generation 1 electric vehicles got scrapped – is that hard to understand !?!?
/K
27. May 2009 at 9:28 pm
he should make a flash light sized one with a crank to start it up
29. May 2009 at 4:07 pm
How do you explain people who invent these things not submitting proof of the capabilities to a scientific journal and patenting the technology? They’d win a Nobel prize, instantly become the most famous inventor to have lived, and have the sole intellectual rights to a product worth billions.
29. May 2009 at 8:10 pm
You are correct. These guys haven’t found how to break the laws of physics. This is perpetual motion Lol.
3. June 2009 at 11:23 am
Overunity is very real
but such toys never will be efficient.
You shoul make it big, much bigger…to get real in/out power difference.
14. June 2009 at 2:47 pm
Over unity devices NEVER work despite what these made up “scientists” claim. They should spend their time improving efficiency and stop kidding themselves.
They all seem self taught.
“Self taught people often have a fool for a teacher”. Adam Peenum
16. June 2009 at 12:45 am
The answer is simple:
A) People who have invented overunity submit their designs for scientific peer review, patents, and win a Nobel Prize for violating/rewriting the laws of physics, and (would) make BILLIONS.
B) People who PRETEND to invent overunity make fake YouTube videos, while ignorant rubes watch in amazement, and manufacture elaborate conspiracies about how “big oil” and “the government” are out to get them!!
Scorecard:
A) 0
B) 1 billion and counting.
Learn physics FIRST!
18. June 2009 at 7:40 pm
Often not always.
19. June 2009 at 9:21 pm
haha amen!
23. June 2009 at 11:05 am
That should be the final word, but the over unity loons will have none of it. “Fuck the laws of physics” is their war cry. Ignorant twats.
23. June 2009 at 11:08 am
Why do these done twats quote voltage as if it is power?
I suppose ignorance is bliss.
23. June 2009 at 2:58 pm
zzytrewq says:
“Why do these twats quote voltage as if it is power?”
I agree, they’re ignorant twats.
The bigger question is why these idiots use over-the-counter DMMs (meters) to measure? Those meters have no chance in hell of measuring accurately for their little home-grown unknown pulse generators (and it still wouldn’t show total POWER/ENERGY even if they did). They need an oscilloscope and some fancy math to measure the true output.
Either ignorant or deceptive, take your pick.
24. June 2009 at 11:20 am
Agree totally.
Isn’t it strange that no one has even built one of these devices and sold it as a toy or novelty? It would be great have a desk mobile that just went all day…
But no, the big nasty corporations shut down all the toy factories that try to make them. LOL
27. June 2009 at 3:43 am
Yeah, I built a newman motor today and it has already been running for 2 hours 45 minutes and counting with no sign of slowing down (it’s doing pretty descent rpm’s) on just 1 AA battery. The battery shows a lower voltage/amperage than initial, but I tested it while the motor was running and the voltage was actualy climbing a little.
1. July 2009 at 1:04 am
shut up creep
look up Ismael aviso motor same design but high voltage 8 amps INPUT form Battery
15 amps output from mtor to 2nd battery
watts is aamps X watts if a stupid twat like you wants to know.
1. July 2009 at 1:07 am
go to hell asshole.
the movie crew and producer didnt know differnce between amsp and volts and watts!!! this is why I “reduced” talk to battery charging and that is it.
Ididnt make final cuts to film dont blame me for this video I dont like it either