You are very incorrect, Magnets are one of the least understood forces to date bud. Magnetism is all in “theories”, much like all science.
And by “physics” I’m sure your talking about the laws of thermodynamics, which are incorrect. Existence in itself defies them. Can’t get something for nothing, yet, you have existence for nothing? Where did you come from? Where did that come from? Etc. etc. until finally you get something for nothing, or perpetual existence. Both defy physics.
I see….You don’t know anything about it….but it’s all wrong….
Again I see the “creationist” mentality focused on “free energy.” It interests me, it really does. Apparently its COMFORTING to be ignorant. When you’re ignorant, anything you want can be true or false–you just call it how you like it.
perpetual existance has nothing to do with this debate. it is philosophical.
and “unproven to be right” doesn’t actually mean anything, does it? i’ve just read some of your other comments (it seems you have some issue with thermodynamics). now i know what sort of person i’m dealing with, i don’t think i can be bothered with you anymore. enjoy your convoluted semantic debates (but please leave science to those who know what they are talking about).
Lol yes, the laws of thermodynamics are incorrect. This is easily proven, but I already see your a bit of a science theory sheep, so I’ll leave you to your “Oh so high” throne of “un proven” knowledge. (funny how you believe in un proven science theories and not god).
You’ll never get anywhere being biased, you gotta research both sides with an open mind or your just a sheep.
maybe you should first look up the word “agnostic” before you make assumpions about my belief system. you stupid SHEEP.
where does it say ANYTHING about my belief in God (or otherwise).
it is you who is closed minded. i have room in my life for science and spirituality. you still havent demonstrated how the 4 laws are wrong, and i really don’t expect you to.
apology accepted.
but you claimed the 4 laws were incorrect, and that you could prove them wrong.
your entire credibility in this thread now depends on you backing up that claim ,preferably mathematically (with some type of continuity equation), or with some other peer-reviewed text.
understand? you have made the claim several times. now you need to back it up, or anyone who knows about science is going to laugh at you.
Dude, you are talking about, for instance “Where did you come from?” as in, hey look 30 years a go there wasn’t a “GUILDGOB” and now there it is, well if that’s the case let me remind you that you spend 9 months inside your mom, forming, feeding and growing, using the resources she gave you, eventually you were born and from there on, as you ate you grew, your body used what it needed to make you who you are now! so there is no such thing as “get something for nothing”…
… as far as who you are like an object, you were formed from other objects, and when you die your body will become part of something else, but you as a person, a human been that lives right now, you may live for ever in your thoughts and actions, but that is another subject, as far as physics I think people make mistakes but look at how far we’ve come, mistakes always are found eventually, so if physics are incorrect, prove them wrong.
“Never tell the truth to people who are not worthy of it.” – Mark Twain
As far as coming from my mother, yes, but where did the matter come from to make me to begin with? Then the matter that made that? Back date it all the way back to the big bang theory and what made that? It doesn’t make sense unless something came from nothing, and in thermodynamics, it’s impossible.
Amplification components also break this rule, although we accept theories to loophole it.
“suuure” to what? You act like I’m trying to convince you. I’m telling you facts bud.
I already gave you one factual example, “vertical windmills”. And you can make them virtually frictionless with two donut magnets on the shaft holding it up to free spin.
No oil, low friction, and generates electricity. Go QQ somewhere else.
“amplification components” amplifiers, use an input and a power resource to AMPLIFY the input signal, why the hell would they need a A/C connection if they weren’t using it?!!!!
Lol you clearly know little about amplification components. I don’t have the time or will to lecture you through an electronics course, but If you are interested, then take one =)
yes, maybe I will from someone who actually knows something about electronics, and science, not from a crazy guy who thinks he can proove wrong modern physics just by saying so
Four months of elapsed time, and thats your message?
First, I’m NOT going to share my scientific findings with random chodes on youtube like yourself. (Your profile speaks for itself, your an angry UK troll provoking arguments on youtube. Mostly political). Go team you. You lead an important life.
And second, who cares if you have degree’s. If you’d ever been in a true scientific environment, you would know, only the jokes of scientists, go around toting degrees.
firstly, you WOULDN’T share your scientific “findings” because you don’t have any. and if you did, they would be ridiculed.
secondly, if YOU had EVER been inside an academic center you would know that degrees are OFTEN thrown in peoples faces, particularly in an elitist environment such as aerospace.
you dumb little bitch, get back to your ufo/antigravity shit.
I thought you should have bought up that gyroscopes were completely unexplained until around the 60 – 70′s and were thought to be witch craft before then, but very nice work telling those pricks where to shove it.
13. May 2009 at 5:45 am
You are very incorrect, Magnets are one of the least understood forces to date bud. Magnetism is all in “theories”, much like all science.
And by “physics” I’m sure your talking about the laws of thermodynamics, which are incorrect. Existence in itself defies them. Can’t get something for nothing, yet, you have existence for nothing? Where did you come from? Where did that come from? Etc. etc. until finally you get something for nothing, or perpetual existence. Both defy physics.
13. May 2009 at 6:07 am
I see….You don’t know anything about it….but it’s all wrong….
Again I see the “creationist” mentality focused on “free energy.” It interests me, it really does. Apparently its COMFORTING to be ignorant. When you’re ignorant, anything you want can be true or false–you just call it how you like it.
13. May 2009 at 11:53 am
perpetual existance has nothing to do with this debate. it is philosophical.
and “unproven to be right” doesn’t actually mean anything, does it? i’ve just read some of your other comments (it seems you have some issue with thermodynamics). now i know what sort of person i’m dealing with, i don’t think i can be bothered with you anymore. enjoy your convoluted semantic debates (but please leave science to those who know what they are talking about).
13. May 2009 at 6:55 pm
Lol yes, the laws of thermodynamics are incorrect. This is easily proven, but I already see your a bit of a science theory sheep, so I’ll leave you to your “Oh so high” throne of “un proven” knowledge. (funny how you believe in un proven science theories and not god).
You’ll never get anywhere being biased, you gotta research both sides with an open mind or your just a sheep.
14. May 2009 at 5:13 pm
maybe you should first look up the word “agnostic” before you make assumpions about my belief system. you stupid SHEEP.
where does it say ANYTHING about my belief in God (or otherwise).
it is you who is closed minded. i have room in my life for science and spirituality. you still havent demonstrated how the 4 laws are wrong, and i really don’t expect you to.
14. May 2009 at 5:17 pm
im waiting. prove thermodynamics wrong. WITH MATHEMATICS. or get the fuck out.
i’m sure you know what a continuity equation is. try me, bitch.
14. May 2009 at 6:41 pm
“bitch”? Lol no. I’m not your math bitch. You might of persuaded me had you gone about it differently.
Sorry for posting about your beliefs, mixed you up with a similar poster. My mistake and I take it back.
15. May 2009 at 9:10 am
apology accepted.
but you claimed the 4 laws were incorrect, and that you could prove them wrong.
your entire credibility in this thread now depends on you backing up that claim ,preferably mathematically (with some type of continuity equation), or with some other peer-reviewed text.
understand? you have made the claim several times. now you need to back it up, or anyone who knows about science is going to laugh at you.
15. May 2009 at 9:11 am
and its not my job to persuade you. the scientific community agrees with thermodynamics.
it is YOU that needs to do the persuading.
10. September 2009 at 8:17 pm
Dude, you are talking about, for instance “Where did you come from?” as in, hey look 30 years a go there wasn’t a “GUILDGOB” and now there it is, well if that’s the case let me remind you that you spend 9 months inside your mom, forming, feeding and growing, using the resources she gave you, eventually you were born and from there on, as you ate you grew, your body used what it needed to make you who you are now! so there is no such thing as “get something for nothing”…
10. September 2009 at 8:25 pm
… as far as who you are like an object, you were formed from other objects, and when you die your body will become part of something else, but you as a person, a human been that lives right now, you may live for ever in your thoughts and actions, but that is another subject, as far as physics I think people make mistakes but look at how far we’ve come, mistakes always are found eventually, so if physics are incorrect, prove them wrong.
11. September 2009 at 3:30 am
“Never tell the truth to people who are not worthy of it.” – Mark Twain
As far as coming from my mother, yes, but where did the matter come from to make me to begin with? Then the matter that made that? Back date it all the way back to the big bang theory and what made that? It doesn’t make sense unless something came from nothing, and in thermodynamics, it’s impossible.
Amplification components also break this rule, although we accept theories to loophole it.
11. September 2009 at 3:32 am
Actually, you could do a lot easier things to make electricity to make them. Even ways that don’t take oil.
Vertical windmill for example. (I have others but I’m waiting on patents)
13. September 2009 at 10:57 am
suuure
14. September 2009 at 3:35 am
“suuure” to what? You act like I’m trying to convince you. I’m telling you facts bud.
I already gave you one factual example, “vertical windmills”. And you can make them virtually frictionless with two donut magnets on the shaft holding it up to free spin.
No oil, low friction, and generates electricity. Go QQ somewhere else.
14. September 2009 at 7:40 pm
“amplification components” amplifiers, use an input and a power resource to AMPLIFY the input signal, why the hell would they need a A/C connection if they weren’t using it?!!!!
15. September 2009 at 10:02 pm
Lol you clearly know little about amplification components. I don’t have the time or will to lecture you through an electronics course, but If you are interested, then take one =)
21. September 2009 at 4:24 pm
yes, maybe I will from someone who actually knows something about electronics, and science, not from a crazy guy who thinks he can proove wrong modern physics just by saying so
21. September 2009 at 5:03 pm
my BEng in Aerospace Systems and MEng in Avionics qualifies ME to comment on electricity AND thermodynamics, you sad little worm hahaha.
21. September 2009 at 5:04 pm
what?
21. September 2009 at 6:34 pm
sorry “hypnotekk” was talking to “GUILDGOB”
22. September 2009 at 7:57 am
Four months of elapsed time, and thats your message?
First, I’m NOT going to share my scientific findings with random chodes on youtube like yourself. (Your profile speaks for itself, your an angry UK troll provoking arguments on youtube. Mostly political). Go team you. You lead an important life.
And second, who cares if you have degree’s. If you’d ever been in a true scientific environment, you would know, only the jokes of scientists, go around toting degrees.
22. September 2009 at 8:12 am
And lastly, get over yourself. You think you know everything.
You’ll be surprised one day =)
22. September 2009 at 2:06 pm
firstly, you WOULDN’T share your scientific “findings” because you don’t have any. and if you did, they would be ridiculed.
secondly, if YOU had EVER been inside an academic center you would know that degrees are OFTEN thrown in peoples faces, particularly in an elitist environment such as aerospace.
you dumb little bitch, get back to your ufo/antigravity shit.
6. May 2010 at 12:37 pm
@GUILDGOB
I thought you should have bought up that gyroscopes were completely unexplained until around the 60 – 70′s and were thought to be witch craft before then, but very nice work telling those pricks where to shove it.